Accuracy and Reproducibility of Acoustic Tomography Significantly Increase with Precision of Sensor Position
Keywords:Acoustic tomography, Picea abies, repeatability, reproducibility
Acoustic tomograms are widely used in tree risk assessment. They should be accurate,
repeatable and comparable between consecutive measurements. Previous work has failed to address the effects of different approaches to record sensor positions, operators and models of tomograph on the resulting tomograms.
In this study, three operators used the two most common sonic tomograph
models to measure seven cross-sections of Norway spruce trees, which
were felled after the measurement. We evaluated the effects of model, operator, and different approaches to measure sensor positions on the quality of the tomograms.
The largest source of error was the position of sensors, affecting
estimated stress wave velocity, the shape of the tomogram, and the size
of the defect.
To produce accurate and repeatable tomograms of trees with complex shapes,
it is essential to measure the sensor positions precisely.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).