Auswirkungen von COVID-19 auf das Arbeiten von Zuhause – eine Analyse auf Basis der Daten des Deutschen Mobilitätpanels
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34647/jmv.nr10.id72Schlagworte:
COVID-19, Heimarbeit, Home-Office, Längsschnittdaten, Paneldaten, PendelnAbstract
In diesem Paper wird eine Analyse der Auswirkungen von Home Office und der Einflüsse auf die Entscheidung, von zu Hause aus zu arbeiten vorgestellt. Dank des Paneldesigns liefert das Deutsche Mobilitätspanel einzigartige Daten von Personen, die vor und während der COVID-19-Pandemie teilgenommen haben. Unsere Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die die Pandemie das Pendelverhalten stark beeinflusst hat und die Veränderungen teilweise auch zukünftig bleiben werden.
Literaturhinweise
Beck, M.J., Hensher, D.A., Wei, E., 2020. Slowly coming out of COVID-19 restrictions in Australia: Implications for working from home and commuting trips by car and public transport. Journal of Transport Geography 88, 102846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102846.
Clear, F., Dickson, K., 2005. Teleworking practice in small and medium-sized firms: management style and worker autonomy. New Technology, Work and Employment 20, 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2005.00155.x.
de Haas, M., Faber, R., Hamersma, M., 2020. How COVID-19 and the Dutch `intelligent lockdown’ change activities, work and travel behaviour: Evidence from longitudinal data in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 6, 100150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100150.
Destatis, 2019. Bevölkerung, Erwerbstätige, Erwerbslose: Deutschland, Jahre, Geschlecht, Beschäftigungsumfang, Altersgruppen.
Ecke, L., Chlond, B., Magdolen, M., Vortisch, P., 2020. Deutsches Mobilitätspanel (MOP) - Wissenschaftliche Begleitung und Auswertungen Bericht 2019/2020: Alltagsmobilität und Fahrleistung. https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000126557.
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Ed.), 2018. Eurofound yearbook 2017 - Living and working in Europe. Eurofound yearbook.
European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Ed.), 2010. Telework in the European Union.
Felstead, A., Jewson, N., Phizacklea, A., Walters, S., 2002. The option to work at home: another privilege for the favoured few? New Technology, Work and Employment 17, 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-005X.00105.
Fosgerau, M., Mabit, S.L., 2013. Easy and flexible mixture distributions. Economics Letters 120, 206–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.03.050.
Gärling, T., Axhausen, K.W., 2003. Introduction: Habitual travel choice. Transportation 30, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021230223001.
Handy, S.L., Mokhtarian, P.L., 1995. Planning for Telecommuting Measurement and Policy Issues. Journal of the American Planning Association 61, 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369508975623.
Hess, S., Palma, D., 2021. Apollo version 0.2.4, user manual.
Hess, S., Palma, D., 2019. Apollo: A flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application. Journal of Choice Modelling 32, 100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2019.100170.
Hiselius, L.W., Arnfalk, P., 2021. When the impossible becomes possible: COVID-19’s impact on work and travel patterns in Swedish public agencies. European Transport Research Review 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00471-9.
Kolarova, V., Eisenmann, C., Nobis, C., Winkler, C., Lenz, B., 2021. Analysing the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on everyday travel behaviour in Germany and potential implications for future travel patterns. European Transport Research Review 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00486-2.
Mokhtarian, P.L., Salomon, I., 1996a. Modeling the choice of telecommuting: 2. A case of the preferred impossible alternative. Environment and Planning 28, 1859–1876.
Mokhtarian, P.L., Salomon, I., 1996b. Modeling the Choice of Telecommuting 3: Modelling the Choice of Telecommuting 3: Identifying the Choice Set and Estimating Binary Models for Technology-Based Alternatives. Environment and Planning 28, 1877–1894.
Molloy, J., Schatzmann, T., Schoeman, B., Tchervenkov, C., Hintermann, B., Axhausen, K.W., 2021. Observed impacts of the Covid-19 first wave on travel behaviour in Switzerland based on a large GPS panel. Transport Policy 104, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.01.009.
Shakibaei, S., de Jong, G.C., Alpkökin, P., Rashidi, T.H., 2021. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on travel behavior in Istanbul: A panel data analysis. Sustainable cities and society 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102619.
Shamshiripour, A., Rahimi, E., Shabanpour, R., Mohammadian, A., 2020. How is COVID-19 reshaping activity-travel behavior? Evidence from a comprehensive survey in Chicago. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives 7, 100216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100216.
Train, K.E., 2009. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805271.
WHO, 2020. Listings of WHO’s response to COVID-19.
Zumkeller, D., Chlond, B., 2009. Dynamics of Change: Fifteen-Year German Mobility Panel, in: Transportation Research Board (Ed.), TRB 88th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers.
Veröffentlicht
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Copyright (c) 2021 Anna Reiffer, Miriam Magdolen, Lisa Ecke, Peter Vortisch
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht-kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International.
